Output Comparison
Design a modern SaaS landing page for an AI analytics platform with hero, feature grid, testimonials, pricing, and call-to-action.
UXMAGIC
Clear step-by-step progress → reduces uncertainty
Strong control over screens & export settings
Later steps feel overwhelming
Too process-heavy, not value-focused
Same.new
Generate a clean fintech dashboard with transaction table, KPI cards, filters, charts, and responsive sidebar navigation.
UXMAGIC
Same.new
UXMagic
UXMagic is an AI-powered design-to-code platform that generates structured, editable, and production-ready UI using Figma, Auto-Layout, and component systems. It supports Prompt to Figma ready design, Screenshot to UI design, URL to Design System UI and multi-platform exports(React, Webflow, HTML and Shopify). It is built for real product teams, not just fast clones.
Same.new
Same.new is an AI-based website cloning and remix tool. It allows users to paste a URL and generate a pixel-matched React clone, then modify it through natural language (“vibe coding”). It focuses on Reverse engineering websites, Rapid landing page creation and Frontend inspiration & remixing.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | UXMagic | Same.new |
|---|---|---|
| Prompt to UI | Generates multi-screen UI flows with reusable components | Edits and refactors cloned layouts |
| URL to UI | Clones public URLs into structured, editable Figma layouts with assets | Clones sites into React code |
| Figma Integration | Native Figma output with Auto Layout | No design-system level Figma sync |
| Export Options | React, HTML, Cursor/Antigravity Ready Zip files | React / Next.js only |
| Real-Time Preview | Live Figma ↔ code sync | Live code preview |
| Style Guide | Brand tokens for color, typography, and UI styles | Inherits styles from source site |
| Component Editing | AI-based component edits across screens | Visual refactoring only |
UXMagic
Pricing Comparison
Free – $0
30 free credits(One Time) upto 5 screens 5 projects 1 Figma Export UI Design Wireframe Mode Sectional Editing
Premium – $25/month
480 credits (Monthly) upto 80 screens 20 Projects 80 Figma Exports Export Code UI Design Wireframe Screenshot to UI Sketch to UI Text Editing & Upload Images Sectional Editing
Ulitmate – $50/month
1500 credits (Monthly) upto 250 screens Unlimited Projects 250 Figma Exports Export Code UI Design Wireframe Screenshot to UI Sketch to UI Import your Figma components/Design System Clone a site(from URL) Sectional Editiing Text Editing & Upload Images
Basic – $10/month
2, 000, 000 tokens per month Premium model Download projects Remix projects
Pro – $25/month
5, 000, 000 tokens per month Premium model Download projects Remix projects
Max – $50/month
10, 000, 000 tokens per month Premium model Download projects Remix projects
Ultra – $100/month
20, 000, 000 tokens per month Premium model Download projects Remix projects Token Usage Beyond 20M: Pay as you go: $10 per additional 2 million tokens
Final Verdict
The battle of UXMagic vs Same.new is really a battle of Strategy vs Speed.
UXMagic wins at design systems, production readiness, and enterprise workflows.
Same.new wins at instant cloning and vibe replication.
If you’re building a real product, brand, or startup that must scale- UXMagic is the superior long-term investment. If you’re hacking together landing pages fast- Same.new is a powerful shortcut.
got questions?we have answers.
Same.dev specializes in website cloning. UXMagic offers approximately 95% accuracy in cloning with structured URL-to-UI with design system control.
Yes. UXMagic is the best Same.new alternative for teams needing clean Figma, components, and export flexibility.
Yes. UXMagic focuses on maintainable, scalable UI systems, not just pixel replication.
UXMagic generates original UI based on design systems, while Same.new’s cloning may raise IP concerns.
Startups building long-term products should choose UXMagic. Growth experiments can use Same.new .
Related comparisons
Weighing up more than one tool? Here is how UXMagic compares against the closest alternatives.